For our first discussion of phase II, we’d like to hear your views on the emergency  environment:

– How do the Red Cross Red Crescent global tools fit into today’s emergency response environment?

-How compatible are these global tools with that of other actors?

– What are the key features of the “Emerging Operational Environment” to which the Movement must adapt?

Please leave a comment (click on “Leave a reply”) to contribute to the conversation!

For our second discussion of phase II, we’d like to hear your views on decision-making and integration:

-What changes would you most want to see in how the Movement organises surge capacity and decisions are made?

– How can gender and diversity be better integrated in these tools?

-How can host NS be better integrated with these tools?

Please leave a comment (click on “Leave a reply”) to contribute to the conversation!

For our third discussion of phase II, we’d like to hear your views on coordination:

– How should Movement coordination for these tools be managed?

-How could we best bring the voices of beneficiary and first responders into the response?

– How can we help first responders deliver faster and better service to beneficiaries?

Please leave a comment (click on “Leave a reply”) to contribute to the conversation!

For our forth discussion of phase II, we’d like to hear your views on gaps and looking forward:

-Where are the gaps in emergency response that the Movement should be filling?

-Ideally, what should the future global tools look like?

– Are other responding organisations (e.g. UN agencies, their implementing partners and NGOs) meeting better the needs of beneficiaries and first responders that the Movement could learn from?

Please leave a comment (click on “Leave a reply”) to contribute to the conversation!